Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.
|Published (Last):||10 August 2005|
|PDF File Size:||7.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.37 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Author Lubis, Aan Fourdes.
What it is and how it Works. But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf. Sovereignty over Ligitan and Sipadan Islands Indonesia v.
Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Dxn finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia.
Text Bab I 1HK Based on the research, the writer concluded that the effect of International Court of Justice decision in Sipadan and Ligitan case between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning Regional boundary of the State is no longer appropriate.
Sources of data used in this study are secondary data, obtained through books, internet sites, journals, and kasjs related to this research. Metadata Show full item record. The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data.
Ligitan and Sipadan dispute
Retrieved 13 September Abstract Indonesia’s diplomatic relations with friendly countries especially with Malaysia was formally established since 31 August when Malaysia declared its independence. Sovereignty over the islands has been disputed by Indonesia and Malaysia since and intensified in when Indonesia discovered that Malaysia had built some tourist facilities on Sipadan island.
Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah.
The Philippines had applied during the proceedings to intervene over the case on the basis of their claim to northern Borneo. The problem of this research is how the effect of International Court of Justice decision in case kkasus Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning regional boundary of the State.
Government of the Philippines. In order to solve the problems above, the writer conducted Library Study for the data collecting. Thus Malaysia is entitled to draw the base line as the boundary of its territory to the outermost point of Pulau Sipadan and Pulau Ligitan.
Moreover, for data analysis the writer use descriptive qualitative. The dispute arises from the application of different principles to the determination of the boundaries of the continental shelf among neighboring countries, causing a region of overlap which can cause disputes.
Archived from dsn original PDF on 13 September EngvarB from February Use dmy dates from February Divided among multiple claimants. This research tries to explain the diplomacy of Indonesia and Malaysia as well as the settlement of ownership of Sipadan island and Ligitan island.
International Court of Justice. In the early days of bilateral relations, both countries experienced an era of confrontation in Collections Skripsi Sarjana .
The court strongly rejected the Philippines’ attempt of intervention and in doing so cited that the request made by the Philippines did not relate to the subject matter of the case.
Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius. Retrieved 7 February ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”. Some features of this site may not work lititan it.
The uncertainty of state boundaries and territorial status is often a source of dispute among nations adjacent or adjacent. This page was last edited on 11 Septemberat The consideration of the judges of the International Court of Justice in winning Malaysia is based on several factors: Views Read Edit View kasud.
Archived from the original on 5 March Text Halaman Judul 0HK But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in Retrieved from ” https: The reason for this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are now belong to Malaysia.
The Philippines query was sipadqn dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen dann to one.
Kasus Indonesia vs Malaysia by claudia hartono on Prezi
The dispute began in and was largely resolved by the International Court of Justice ICJ inwhich opined that both of the islands belonged to Malaysia. But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a ligita the court using this as the main reason decided to livitan the islands to Malaysia based on their “effective occupation”.